Does IP Video have a cost advantage? Are the costs of an IP system more or less than typical analog systems of Digital Video Recorders (DVRs) and analog cameras?
The total component costs of IP video can be higher than a DVR solution with analog cameras. The component costs for IP video usually include network cameras, video management software, servers and storage.
The higher cost of hardware can be offset by the reduced labor and cabling costs when using Power over Ethernet. The cost of analog cabling can average 3 times the cost of cabling for network cameras. Analog cameras require a separate power cable while fixed network cameras can use Power-over-Ethernet to deliver power over the CAT-5 network cable. Analog cameras also require separate cabling for PTZ control.
Leveraging existing network and storage systems can also reduce costs. It is very common for enterprise sites to use existing network and storage capacity for a new or expanded video system.
As a general rule the cost of an IP system becomes more favorable to analog as the number of cameras increases. Once the server, storage and switches are in place, the incremental cost of adding IP cameras is less than adding analog cameras (requiring additional DVR ports).
Intangible factors can influence the cost of ownership over the life of the system. For example:
Eurochamp, a Spanish company, supplies fresh artificially grown mushrooms (primarily champignons) to the market. The company needed a solution for monitoring and recording product quality, checking it against the information received from suppliers.
"Axxon is always there for us it never leaves partners to deal with problems alone. Theyre available to solve any issues that come up, very quickly. This is just one reason we chose Axxons solutions for the majority of our installations."