Does IP Video have a cost advantage? Are the costs of an IP system more or less than typical analog systems of Digital Video Recorders (DVRs) and analog cameras?
The total component costs of IP video can be higher than a DVR solution with analog cameras. The component costs for IP video usually include network cameras, video management software, servers and storage.
The higher cost of hardware can be offset by the reduced labor and cabling costs when using Power over Ethernet. The cost of analog cabling can average 3 times the cost of cabling for network cameras. Analog cameras require a separate power cable while fixed network cameras can use Power-over-Ethernet to deliver power over the CAT-5 network cable. Analog cameras also require separate cabling for PTZ control.
Leveraging existing network and storage systems can also reduce costs. It is very common for enterprise sites to use existing network and storage capacity for a new or expanded video system.
As a general rule the cost of an IP system becomes more favorable to analog as the number of cameras increases. Once the server, storage and switches are in place, the incremental cost of adding IP cameras is less than adding analog cameras (requiring additional DVR ports).
Intangible factors can influence the cost of ownership over the life of the system. For example:
Raiffeisen Bank Aval, a branch of the global Raiffeisen International Bank, is one of the largest Ukranian banks, serving nearly 4 million customers and over 200,000 legal entities. In any bank, particularly one with such reputation and customer base, safety is utmost importance
"Axxon support is second to none. When transitioning your largest customer to a new software platform there is always a major concern. Axxon stood by me every step of the way and used all there resources to make this a success."